@praveen They are talking about projects and services run by some US corporations, not gnu.org. Useful for dramatic effect, if a little disingenuous.
Surely US law punishes Iranian people unfairly and unnecessarily. But like they've stated, that is not something free software projects or people can control directly.
They must also know what they can do: use free software (Tor, I2P,...) that is created for circumventing these barriers. Not ideal, but free software solutions do exist.
There's also the myth that free software license grants enough freedoms on its own.
Free software Iicense is worth very little without the ability to meaningfully participate in a free software project, as this post shows. After all, free software is about communal ownership. If a person is ostracized from the community, they can't meaningfully say that the communal ownership benefits them.
That is not entirely true. People who don't actively control also benefits from other people having the freedom to control. For example Fahad Al Zaidi adding Arabic support in Scribus directly benefited every Indian language user as well.
@praveen @akshay @popolon Strictly speaking about projects listed in the blog post, they are all controlled by US corporations. What incentive they have to move their stuff? (They are fluid with their tax jurisdiction, but that is a digression.)
I would not look for "community" in corporate-controlled projects, given the asymmetric power relation. I suppose that depends on your definition of community. Fedora comes close, and might have a reason to move, if RH's lawyers approve the move.
@praveen @akshay @popolon The trend all over the world has been governments grabbing more power and more centralization, and technology has been enabling that. By moving outside the US, projects might be trading one set of problems with a new set of problems.
A technical strategy that makes location irrelevant might work too, like geographic distribution or not revealing your real location or p2p.
Back in the days of Crypto Wars, Phil Zimmerman printed and shipped PGP source code to circumvent export restrictions. Eventually governments saw the light. I believe that was a case of successful activism. Things like that can happen again.
If US corporations do business with embargoed nations, they will be trouble and that will hurt their bottomline. They are extremely capable of influencing their government's decisions, but it doesn't seem that they have made an effort in that direction.
@popolon Ok, that is a big complicated topic.
My understanding is this: because of absence of social safety nets and limited private property rights, Chinese households save a large portion of their income. They are not big spenders.
Westerners spend more, and save little. They consume what China produces, and their spending is financed by Chinese savings. Also, following China's entry to the WTO, most US industrial production has moved to China.
Hence the empty containers.
@popolon US has been exporting agricultural products (wheat and soy) to China, but since the previous US administration's trade war, China has started buying from other countries. That also might explain the trade imbalance.
There's friction between governments, but I don't know if Chinese people en masse are boycotting US products. Perhaps they do. I don't know why shipping costs have recently started to raise, because overall trade imbalance between China and US is not new.
> But like they've stated, that is not something free software projects or people can control directly.
No, there is definitely things that Free Software projects can do, they can move their hosting outside US. Like @popolon mentioned about RISC-V foundation. No other country does world policing to the level of USA.
ഫെഡറേറ്റഡ് സോഷ്യൽ വെബ്ബിലെ മലയാളിക്കൂട്ടം.